hi everyone this is shai from raising the frequency
in israel and today i'm again with lovely magda taylor
straight from the uk hi magda how you doing
i'm okay thank you it's a bit dull and rainy here today but never mind
right well in israel uh it's now sunny and quite warm
it's quite warm actually and so we're going to speak about uh flawed
theories obviously regarding uh the science of vaccines
and yeah but do you want i just i just tell the audience
the first few slides may be a bit complicated
by then but then they they're getting uh simpler or maybe i got it wrong sorry
you say well not complicated so much there's
some of them have got some i like to quote people because all these
things you know generally are other people's words they're not mine
just found them all and put them together for you but yeah we they're a
little bit with we'll be still in the history
sort of era just for a short while but then we slowly move
through the 20th century up to now and what they're up to so we're just
touching on some of the main i you know one thing i would always say
to anyone who contacts the informed parent you know
it's good to have a background story you know
you really need background story in all aspects because if you just suddenly see
a headline mumps epidemic or whatever or there's
this pandemic or you know everyone panics and and it's
good complete unders well it can't never be
complete but you you try to keep building on it yeah so um okay
uh can you share your screen i mean you're going to show us a presentation
right yeah green yes and then that's
uh this one isn't it so we'll press that and we'll fill in
that is that right
let's do oh stop playing while you're doing that i just tell the
audience for those of you who would like to support my work and so i can continue
and do what i do anyway i'll do it but to show your
appreciation is great uh just go to the link for patreon and
just support as much as you like from one dollar
and and upwards really as much as you like
every cent matters thank you very much magda the stage is yours okay thank you
yeah okay so yes our vaccination the flawed theories
so the first one there we have louis pasteur peeping through
the text the germs theory of disease he's the father of the germs theory of
disease and this whole vaccination thing really
is based on the germ theory which although came
after jenna that's how they started to bring it all
in the whole idea this germ causes this and this germ causes that
you know so louis pasteur he but he came from that angle that
microbes or germs they come from the outside
and just can randomly invade you you know you could just be standing quietly
at a bus stop and and a measles virus will come along or
bacteria and such that was his idea he also believed that germs they can't
change they're just monomorphic and uh every disease has a
specific germ so that's how germs cause disease and
the only way we can deal with this is you either have to kill the germ
or you avoid contamination or you protect from the germ which is obviously
how they fitted the vaccine idea into it there was a
great book written in 95 1995 the new york times reported
sensational discoveries in the diaries of louis pasteur
and this professor guyson after reviewing over ten
thousand pages of pasteur's diaries geison of the historical institute at
the university of princeton usa reported that if the results of pasteur's
experiments did not live up to his expectations he modified his
experiments until they provided the outcome desired to prove his ideas
this meant that pasteur had deliberately falsified scientific experiments to suit
his own purpose well well yes well why aren't we surprised and he
also had a very good friend he was very good friends with napoleon
um you know he was in with the right people
and very charismatic apparently dr buchwald a german doctor who sadly
passed away just a few years ago although he was
around 90 so he had a good innings but anyway he
um wrote a book the decline of tuberculosis despite
despite protective vaccination and he put in his
um text in the light of these discoveries
meaning the fraudulent work of louis pasteur
it may turn out that the accepted theories
about immunity immune protection immune defense and antibodies
which are based on louis pasteur's experiments are based on false premises
oh deal yes i know and so now we have this other chap in
front happened to be french as well who many people haven't heard of antoine
pershon and he had an alternative theory and he
believed he he referred to them as micro zimas and
he he observed them in all living things and
that they're able to evolve into bacterial forms depending on the
soil the terrain of the individual and he actually had a
very different abuse microbes are changeable so they're not
monomorphic they are cleomorphic and they change
with the environment some people as you know some people very
prone to fungal infections and others aren't and it's all
very much what's how what's going on inside your system and
what are you feeding it with so he looked at the toxicity of the
the terrain and he said that's what causes this ease
you know you're in ease when you've come out of it so his view was that
you need to change the soil by addressing living
environment lifestyle nutrition physical emotional well-being
exactly what we found in the last history one how they change
as we improved our living less disease he was
basically i can say he was spot-on he was spot-on in my opinion as well it
makes so much more sense i mean we see today also with
epigenetics i mean it's it's you know it's there i'm not he
nailed it something i found because people say how do you
know this is true how do you know this is true
well i find that as i look and the more you learn
some things just resonate as truth and they also remember vera scheibner
was saying the truth always fits together very well
yeah you know it's like doing a jigsaw um so
very interesting he wrote a book called the blood and its
third element and he had an american chap
levison who translated it and and two weeks before
brashant died um levison traveled over he
um he'd been corresponding with him for years and
uh he just happened to be there and he luckily just managed to meet
preschool but and this is levison's words he said
the study of these and of other discoveries of professor
bishop will produce a new departure and a sound basis for the sciences of
biology physiology pathology today
floating in chaotic uncertainty and confusion
and will it is hoped to bring the medical profession back to the right
path of investigation and of practice from which it has been
led astray into the microbian theory of disease
which as before mentioned was declared by beshamp
to be the greatest scientific silliness of the age
that's what uh bashan had come to the conclusion
i'm still waiting by the way for science to find its way back but uh
yeah yes we are we're all waiting um unfortunately
science has been um hijacked by the industry yeah that's as simple as
that so there's some louis pasteur's um tomb the purpose built crypt
at the institute so he was the father of he's seen as the father of germ theory
but apparently near at the end of his life he did admit
but he said bernard who was another one of his friends
uh was correct i was wrong the microbe germ in other words is nothing the
terrain is everything so he he he obviously
mentioned it before he passed away they often admit things before they die
like asking sorry yes yes absolutely they want to go to a nice
place on a fluffy clown yeah yeah so this is another nice little
quote rudolph versio he was a german um
physician and uh the father of modern pathology
he said if i could live my life over again i would devote it to proving that
germs seek their natural habitat disease
tissue rather than being the cause of the diseased tissue
for example he gave it like mosquitoes seek the stagnant water but
they do not cause the pool to be stagnant it's a nice way of looking at
things it's my simple way of remembering and then of course there was another
robert coch who's a famous bacteriologist and
he he also didn't agree with the louis pasteur's germ syrian he said that
there had to be he stated that all four requirements
um must be met before the germs theory to be valid
um he had these four postulates and these four
postulates here you can look them up and i won't
go through them all but basically there's never a situation where
all four of them are met because a specific germ for instance it says must
be found in every case of a disease well you can often i mean tetanus for
instance i know they've often said oh tetanus cases but they couldn't find
this tetani you know clostridium tetani there
but they said it was a tetanus case so it's not always
germ and then from the second point the bacteria must never be discovered apart
from the disease well many of us carry these
meningococcal whatever bacteria in our throats and we're perfectly fine
so even just looking at two of the points you know
you never have a situation where all four
um are valid um in in a particular disease condition
but so and then we did touch on florence nightingale in the last um
presentation so there's a few here now slides because she does
speak very interestingly she said the specific disease
doctrine is the grand refuge of weak uncultured unstable minds such as now
rule in the medical profession there are no specific disease there are
specific disease conditions and she was obviously she was brought up
she i was brought up by both by scientific men and ignorant
women and she only said ignorant women because her mother and
sister they really just wanted her to go to
lots of fancy balls and find a suitable husband and
so that's but she was very um interested in and very curious minded
she was brought up by both scientific men and ignorant women
distinctly to believe that smallpox for instance
was a thing of which there was once a first specimen in the world
which went on to prop on propagating itself
in a perpetual chain of descent just as much as that
there was a first dog or a pair of dogs and that smallpox
would not begin itself any more than having a new dog with beginning
without there having been a parent dog so it was like there was this thing they
always refer to a smallpox however she said
since then i have seen with my eyes and smelled with my nose
smallpox growing up in first specimens either in closed rooms or in overcrowded
wards where it could not by any possibility
have been caught but must have begun name or i have
seen disease begin and grow up and pass into one another so different in turn
passing into different diseases in other words
she as now dogs do not pass into cats and she says i've seen for instance with
a little overcrowding continued fever grow up and with a
little more typhoid fever and with a little more
typhus and all in the same ward or hut true
nursing ignores infection except to prevent it
cleanliness fresh air from open windows with unremitting attention to the
patient are the only defense a true nurse either asks or needs
so such good um observations this is just a little bit of fun
developer of the chiropractic medical procedure he said if the germs
theory were true there'd be no one alive to believe it
i i totally agree yes it's like you know sometimes i i remind
people if the sun was that
cancerous as the scientific community and the health professionals are trying
to convince us we wouldn't be here i know i know
oh i mean my grandma and granddad they wouldn't be here to
bring my mom and dad and to bring me i mean
we would never evolve if the sun was that bad for us i mean it's exactly the
opposite i know my father grew up in cyprus
parents farmers they are out in the in the sun
most days working very hard um
i think with i always say um to people whatever you read in the headlines or
anything announce it's usually the opposite the
opposite exactly an easy way to sort of start thinking
about the subject so anyway i'll just gonna touch on a few
of these things in so immunity so if the germ isn't the
cause of the disease then why then we do not need to
be become immune why do we need to become immune to a germ if it's not the
cause is it needed it is well recognized that
improved living conditions especially clean water reduce disease and death
so by improving the external environment we create a more healthy and internal
environment and we reduce or eliminate disease
cases and fatalities as we saw in the previous
presentation if we recreate recreated the environment of our ancestors like if
we went back 200 years ago then of course it's highly probable that
we would see diseases such as smallpox return
because if we are living in phil's foul air no sanitation and overcrowding
well how can we achieve good health by only introducing a vaccine
do they think that if you continue living in that state
and just come in with a vaccine squad that you're suddenly going to be healthy
it's like the gates foundation in africa they they give children vaccines instead
of good food clean water you know the the basics
well i know i was reading that gates over the
decades you know he's the amount of money he's pumped into
africa for to eradicate polio billions i mean you could have made
some very nice you know um villages with with with clean water running and and
sanitation and all sorts like with all that money i'm
sure they could have done something just to show the true intention i mean
for me it's that obvious yes so health
the only immunity so this is this is a little bit of me
so will the word immunity eventually be recognized as just another term for
health is it actually true that we gain
immunity to a specific disease after experience that disease because that's
the idea behind vaccines that we've supposed to gain
you can experience the same disease more than once
vaccination theory is based on the idea that once you have had a disease it
makes you immune but some individuals do develop diseases
such as smallpox measles chickenpox more than once
why weren't they immune why did they have it again
i mean and this is a nice little quote from 1809 it was a
edinburgh medical and surgical journal this dr
hennan he cited about 150 writers back in the early 1800s
in different languages and in all ages since smallpox was first described
who have attested the occurrence of smallpox twice
or thrice in the same individual so they had smallpox three times even
why didn't they become immune the first time because
really immune immunity is health well if they stay in
poor health conditions then they'll still have it again
so that's i just keep thinking now of the word
health as immunity myself but that's my theory there
so antibody theory there's all these theories
another aspect following on from the germ theory immunity theory and antibody
theory now because none of them are facts you know
p they keep saying the science is settled
well none of these theories are settled their theories
they're they're not facts they're not in concrete
so the theory goes if you have a high level of antibody for a specific disease
you are immune well when a vaccine is administered the
theory is that the body will mount an immune response and produce antibodies
and that these antibodies will protect in the future should you
come in contact with this particular germ
well i found a nice uh paper in fact i i got one of the original copies um
back even back in 1950 in the uk they did a study on diphtheria looking at
dipsteria patients and their antibody levels
and it stated some of the results obtained were so unusual and unexpected
so contradictory and indeed paradoxical that the inquiry as originally envisaged
and put into effect had to be brought to a temporary close
the paradox was this on repeat on repeated occasions it was
found that a sample of serum taken from a patient with a clear history of
inoculation was found to contain quite large
quantities of diphtheria antitoxin so these vaccinated individuals with high
levels of antibody still had dipsterium so they
they they weren't that's why they say they had to bring the study
to a temporary close because they weren't getting the results they
expected and i also in in the 1990s one of them
a homeopath uh and who's got a bachelor of science
behind him he wrote on behalf of the informed parent
to the world health organization we wrote to a chap called dr john clements
about antibody and these are just this is just a quote from dr
john clements he said it's not possible to make an
absolute generalization about what level of antibody protect
is protective in in a given individual so
you know that's very vague to start with and
while the precise level of antibodies needed for protection
is not known for each individual we are sure the protection results
when all but very low levels of antibodies exist
you see none of that really makes sense if it's not possible to make an absolute
generalization and they're not sure yeah that basically
says we don't know he should it would have been quicker
wouldn't it exactly yes yes
i mean we did correspond a few times and i published it all in my newsletter and
of course in the end he said he was far too busy and that
the lay people probably wouldn't understand any more of his discussion so
he ended it there and escaped rapidly so anyway i always try and get people to
think about questioning things you know rather than
you know this is this and this is that so you know there are many questions
surrounding the aspect of antibody theory and i'm only just pointing out
i'm sure there's a lot more but these are just some of the ones i
came up with so what level are supposed to be protective
how often do they even check on the levels i've never had any
checked on apart from when i was pregnant and they they checked for
rubella antibodies but even then we know in medical literature cases
of congenital rubella syndrome have been found
in mothers who had been adequately vaccinated
and had high levels of antibody so why did they
child suffer in that way what about waning levels what's waning
waning is when the antibody levels they say
now they're even admitting it it weight all the levels wane
after a number of years they slowly go become lower and lower
fading away into the sunset so why do some individuals with high
levels develop the disease yeah and yet others with no detectable
level they don't so they found this as well in the past
and also how do they know the medical people
that those that are vaccinate the vaccinated individuals
just because they didn't develop measles i mean would they have developed measles
anyway even if they hadn't been vaccinated see
once we're vaccinated how do we know how healthy we have been
you know so i mean i'm explaining it all really i mean
yeah going back to i mean let's face it we we know that
um measles cases were coming down anyway so left unless
in children were getting measles so they all these ones that don't get it now
maybe they weren't going to get it anyway so it's a false sense of
oh it's protected you but has it the only thing it may have done is not
the edge of your health or maybe made it made it a lot worse or
you're in later in life maybe problems so
i i know someone a woman who got measles when she was young
when she was a girl she was not vaccinated
she got a few years later she got it again then
in her adulthood she decided to go for measles vaccines vaccine yeah she got
the vaccine she got measles after that and
a year ago she got measles again really so it's yes exactly so
yes and also i mean i don't know if i don't think i mention it
here but sspe they sometimes scare people or measles
you can you some people some children develop
sspe which is a very degenerative disease that will
you know you're unlikely to source the adulthood
or if if you develop it later they always say
if the average time of developing it would be
seven years after having a case of measles
well you you find that it's also published that
the same thing could occur after vaccination
and only only it shortens the time um it's three and a half and you know i
don't know about you in in this country we've had um cases
where they had a documentary and they showed this
poor boy 17 lying in bed tubes coming everywhere he was
suffering with this sspe and they said that when he was a one-year-old he
caught measles and he was from an from a child on a bus
while they were on holiday i mean was all a bit peculiar but he had measles
got better at a very young age and then suddenly at
13 he starts to show signs of problems and
and this ssp emerge well i thought that's strange because if the
average time is seven years well that's quite a big gap 13 years
12 years i thought as i watched it did he get a vaccine at some point because
they did a school campaign in mid-1990s
fortunately someone else was thinking along the same lines they got in touch
with the family and yes at 10 years old he had
the mmr and then three and a half you know three
and a half years is the average time after the vaccine
that's when he started showing signs was it mentioned on the documentary
no i i i asked them i asked them why not they said they didn't think it was
relevant to mention that he had the vaccine they
didn't think it was relevant so they miss shane you know i mean just for
those of you out there who see this and listening to
this magda so am i but
we are not doing it just for the information we are not doing it just for
fun for the intellectual challenge we're
doing it actually to save children to inform
parents no wonder magda's magazine is called the
informed parent you know it's so important to
save our little ones the next generation
that's the main focus of all this information and data
and slides and quotes and yeah it's for that it's to
wake us up for us to learn not from tv but from
real science yes and i mean just the main thing i
always try and do is get people to think for themselves
because i can't live their lives i don't want them to just hear something i say
and they oh i better do that no i i mean my theories and ideas and
philosophy of life is what i've developed over the years
but the main thing is to keep thinking don't rely on the so-called experts
because they you have no knowledge knowledge is power
and then you know what you want to do and what you don't want to do
so here here we are with all the sheep herd immunity theory
i know and i i i didn't make this t-shirt i don't sell them but i saw it
online one time and they say it's called herd immunity because you have to be a
sheep to believe in it and um and i say just simply because to
me i'm ice simple questions if if they don't
understand immunity in just one person an individual how can they keep talking
about herd immunity how about they learn about immunity in
one person first then they can talk about
putting it into a bigger into a crowd situation
and so that like i said earlier given that in a natural disease
it is possible like you said also to contract a disease more than once if
natural immunity didn't protect you how does herd immunity work
and you know these are only basic childlike
questions the original theory was based on studying
the number of persons with a history of natural measles infection
and whether this and all and so to look at whether this determined the number of
new cases to be expected in a community and this
hedrick um in 1932 here you know he
he was he was sort of coming to the conclusion that if enough were immune
and that would somehow protect the community as a whole
because it would break the transmission i mean these are just theories again
so and vaccine herd immunity it is claimed you know they claim if we
have a high proportion um you know they always say
95 or you know we must have on whatever i
mean in hedrick's and paper apparently he was only looking
at something around 68 percent he felt so where they got
this 95 percent or 90 whatever percent is it just a number they came up with
because i i can't haven't found any uh evidence of any studies
it's false i mean i know in israel for mises
more than 95 uh vaccinated and still you have misers so i don't
know you know it's total bs it's just total
faith i'm sorry but yeah no no they the only people that should be
apologizing for those who say this rubbish
so anyway so yeah so we are told we need over 95
vaccinated well in reality we don't have 95 percent of the whole population
fixated only 95 of the children they push every
so you know every year so if you just took a
naught to four year old say in the uk this is they account for around 3.6
of the whole uk population so and then uh rest of the you what about the rest
of the uk population so even if you look at over 60 year olds
which is about 16 and they mostly let's face it most of
those haven't had all those vaccines at all they only had one or two or maybe
and so they if there is this natural immunity or as i put in brackets health
you know they've they've established it without any of those vaccines
so you've left with about 80 who may have been vaccinated at kids but
as kids but what about the primary vaccine failure
secondary for vaccine failure weighing in immunity
asymptomatic cases and carriers which we just have a little look
at and there's always just to add sorry for the
for those well those who are uh older than 60 years old all right and
they are still with us and obviously the majority of them had
little vaccines in their life they were still here with us
with less vaccines what about them how can you explain that i mean
is this a miracle what well actually it's a miracle now for
them to avoid the flu vaccine and the and the shingles
vaccine and the pneumococcal they're they're coming after any age anything
that moves basically um you know um so i i hear
you probably the same i've had many conversations over the years with people
who've worked in elderly people's homes um where they've seen after the flu
vaccine does its rounds if you do have a few deaths and and and
or you get very sick um patients there um
yeah i'm just knowing friends of elderly friends you know i say oh no you haven't
had the flu jab because they're very ill and they
oh yes i did actually do you think that would have anything to do with it
yes so actually they said yesterday didn't their new paper came out to say
that there's no evidence that flu vaccine
reduces hospitalizations well we knew that already but anyway
yes they print it as if as if they've just discovered something
yeah so immunity well how long does this last
so we said we looked a little bit in a small box again
when smallpox vaccine was first used it it was supposed to give lifelong
protection and and slowly as time went on the assumed
length of protection shortened you remember we looked at that paper
two weeks and it went down not down to two weeks isn't it
and and if it gets to the point where you have to be vaccinated
annually you would think more people might question its effect
and then also i just say it how many pet owners dutifully
have their cats and dogs vaccinated annually because they have to have it
why don't we hear about herd immunity for pets
well if all these if they all have this cat vaccine
all the cats well shouldn't they have cat hurt immunity
i never hear this no and then we won't we did that on the
last one so we can skip on that because that was just to go up to the
you know this last bit where like you say two weeks it ends up
it's almost like every second meal you know like what
what what i know i know well we had in 1988 when they
brought the mmr out edwina curry was our health minister and
she was very vocal about how wonderful mmr was one
jab lifelong protection but soon within a
few years along came the boosters and as i say
here how can you tell anyway if someone is immune
if antibodies aren't a true indication and
and as we discussed here with earlier i've mentioned it you know they had been
diseases have been declining before so you know when they introduce vaccines
if a vaccinated person does not develop the disease it is claimed
it's only claimed that they were protected
even though it's very likely they were not going to develop it so you know we
keep it's good to repeat things though because sometimes it people remember
them better and you know this isn't to read at all this
is just a i've just taken little headlines
snippets from medical scientific peer-reviewed and all that
papers where there's so many outbreaks
it's highly vaccinated yeah but highly vaccinated populations there's some
great you know the more there's one papers the
more we vaccinate the more measles we are seeing in the vaccinated
i mean it's a ridiculous statement and like you
say night in um dutch uh uh
whooping cough epidemic there was one in 1995 where it was something like
99 were vaccinated and then they're dutch
you know dutch scientists were quick scratch scratching their head wondering
what's happened you know yeah the i mean
it's quite funny because this it's a good slide because just to remind people
some of the scientific institutions and the researches that are done
by proper scientists who are not us they're just doing the job really as
as objectively as possible they put out the information the
information is scientific based you know but still it doesn't
reach the mainstream media so the population
don't know about it it's been blocked like the industry doesn't let this sort
of information come out and what we see or what we get
from the mainstream media is just the just the industry agenda
which goes through the health offices you know the health ministers of
the world or the the un you know who 190
or so countries that cooperate with the industry on that
so we need to remember that the science is there and
this sort of presentation that you give now
is just to show us real science objective science
which doesn't make its way it doesn't make headlines and it doesn't make its
way to the mainstream media which is so important
to learn about this and to make really informed decisions yes and actually just
reminded me mainstream media excuse me um
yes yesterday on the scottish herald they were talking about
mandatory vaccines should be should they be brought in
and in their text they said the journalist said oh in smallpox vaccine
it was made compulsory in 1853 and and it and it was
finally that stopped being mandatory when when smallpox was eradicated in you
know 19 something which is a lie as i showed you last time
they brought this exemption in at the end of the 1800s and lots of
people stopped having it done so they they they don't have the knowledge
journalism today is very poor quality and and then we have people
like our prime minister boris johnson saying
anti-vaxxers are talking mumbo jumbo well these these papers which a lot of
parents i know we we read these things and they're
so it's it's not mumbo jumbo by many of us
so um this is a this is one little paper from
back the journal vaccine 2012 the re-emergence of measles in developed
countries time to develop the next generation
measles vaccine in question in this church gregory
poland so what does he say thus measles outbreaks also occur
even among highly vaccinated populations because of
primary and secondary vaccine failure which results in gradually larger pools
of susceptible persons and outbreaks once measles is introduced
this leads to a paradoxical situation whereby measles in highly immunized
societies occurs primarily among those previously
immunized you know they they have why i've never
seen a paper where they say maybe the vaccine doesn't work
they've never considered that the obvious
and apart from this primary and secondary vaccine failures and the
waning anti-body levels i'm asking a few more questions what
about the asymptomatic carriers that some vaccinees become meaning
you don't have any symptoms but you carry in it
from after you've had the vaccine and are the vaccinated spreading
the disease without realizing due to subclinical disease
without symptoms could the subclinical version
in some vaccines actually be a suppressed
disease so instead of protecting say these children from measles or mumps and
now they say oh as adults they're now developing them in
their 20s it may be it wasn't they protected them
it actually suppressed the child's ability to have that acute
childhood acute you know to chuck out all that rubbish in childhood
so the vaccine comes along suppresses their ability to do that
and then later it after maybe it's sort of worn off or
what waned or whatever you want to to to call it that maybe that's why
they're getting it later because finally the body has got a
chance to to to chuck out this rubbish and
also what long-term outcomes may result in this suppressed version of the
disease you know so many more young you know
even things like alzheimer's or you know it's
starting to occur in in more and more younger people rather
than the elderly and um
even we i think we mentioned them with the
you know the hpv vaccine that's supposed to protect against cervical cancer well
um in fact no i think i've got that coming up on this side i'll we'll talk
about it then better too asymptomatic transmission
and the resurgence of border teller pertussis in other words whooping cough
this was from a 2015 um paper so i put the pub mid
number at the bottom so it said the recent increase in whooping cough
incidents primarily caused by bordetella pertussis
presents a challenge to both public health practitioners and scientists
trying to understand the mechanisms behind its resurgence
so they had these three main hypotheses and
one of them was um to try and explain this resurgence
wayne in waning of this protective immunity
from vaccination or natural infection number two was the evolution of a b
pertussis so a sort of another mutated version
another kind of version of that bacteria so it wouldn't
so the vaccine then wouldn't protect against this other one
the third one was low vaccine coverage so say well maybe we didn't have enough
vaccinating but this la i've highlighted this one
recent studies have suggested a fourth mechanism
asymptomatic transmission from individuals vaccinated with the
currently used acellular vaccines so they're transmitting it yeah this we
know also from other results and from other publications that
the those who get the vaccines they the shed shade how you call it
shed yeah it's shedding it's like shedding
you know i mean yeah i know i mean there's a whole view of virus that's
very different to what we hear in the in the mainstream which we're not
touching on and you know it's theories again they're all theories
but some of the theories make much more sense
than the one we're told and one thing for sure virus
if you you know viruses are not living organisms they shouldn't be
grouped together with bacteria bacteria are living organisms like we are
virus doesn't have a nucleus and uh it's not a living thing it's it's got
it's like a a a capsule with fragments of of
of dna and strands it's how can it it lives on the edge of life
they say in medicine well if it lives on the edge of life how
does it actually get around how does it come into your
body and hijack your cells if it's not alive and they
you know there's yes that's another big big story
on its own so this one is just a mention on polio
because that's another good example of creating more disease
they have it now it's officially called vdpv
vaccine-derived polio viruses and then when they have these outbreaks or cases
worldwide you'll see it often published in fact as
far as i know all the cases these days come under this
category and this little c is just means
circulating vaccine derived polio virus but with it and there's there's evidence
that they can spread person to person
transmission in the community with and it's vaccine derived it's crazy
and this is another little piece that was james cherry
a very well known vaccinator from for many many years and he published in the
journal of uh pediatric infectious disease uh
2019 in the abstract we don't have to read it all but
you know he he basically saying right at the end about the implications for the
future because of linked epitope suppression
all children who were primed by the dtap
vaccines will be more susceptible to pathosis
throughout their lifetimes and there is no easy way to decrease this
increased lifetime susceptibility you know so this is from 2019
yes yes i know you see he must be quite a fair age because he's
he was publishing in back in the 1970s so maybe he's getting to the age where
he wants to start saying well actually he just yeah he says it so blunt i mean
it's you can't say it better it's like i know
i mean this this i took this out of my that's the sort of thing i put in my
newsletter and so you can see right at the end
i i highlight very interesting particularly interesting pieces and i
put tip to the inform pair and emphasis so
that's why it's in involved but so and of course their benefits outweigh
the risks this is what we're told here since well since most reactions don't go
repo they go unreported and they're just dismissed as a coincidence
or they or the baby or the child must have already had an undiagnosed
pre-existing condition so there's absolutely no reliable data
to establish the scale of vaccine injuries and
fatalities you could there's nowhere in this world that
where we've got actual correct data it's all coincidence and not reported and
i don't know if you saw um any of the summit meeting in december
they had a world of vaccine safety summit um
december 2019 and um and they there was some great it was all
filmed so we can we it was great you i haven't watched it
all but i watched quite a bit of it and uh and also it was highlighted on the
dell big tree um high wire they found a an
advert and this you know just a few days so 28th of november
in a promotional video swami nathan this is dr swamy nathan states vaccines
are very safe if someone gets sick after vaccination
it is usually either a coincidence an error administering the vaccine or
very rarely a problem with the vaccine itself that's why we have robust
safety systems there she is well just third of december just a few days
later five days later she said in as she sat
there and addressing all the delegates she
said i think we cannot over emphasize the fact that we really don't
have very good safety monitoring systems for
many countries and this adds to the miscommunication
and the mishap apprehension because we're not able to
give clear cut answers when people ask questions
about the deaths that have occurred due to particular vaccines
and this always gets blown up in the media
you know they're always annoyed oh it's going to get blown up in the media
it's a it's a bit like it makes me think of back in the 90s in france they had a
number of um cases of multiple sclerosis after hep b
vaccine in health professionals and they actually won compensation the
judge ruled that the hep b vaccine was the was the cause
now the the only the biggest worry that the world health organization had was
oh no the french people will lose faith in the vaccine well you know
they should lose faith in it if it's not working and it's causing
ms and all these other things but this seems to be the sort of
continual pattern of whenever there's something discovered
they're only worried about the vaccine program the success of the vaccine
program as well as as well as the attitude of
the people i mean that's their main concern
not yes not never i never hear them say poor child that died poor people
nothing they never say oh dear it's awful
you know they've just lost their babies no it's always about oh no this
this might affect the program yeah how can we challenge
people's attitudes toward the program i i see the same by the way i see the
same with radiation i mean the telecommunication industry they're
making conferences just to find out new ways to
persuade people to change their attitude towards the dangers of radiation
they don't know the actual dangers just about the attitudes of the people
towards the dangers i know but even here the health service
is very you know very low on funds and yet they'll spend
you know millions on a program to advertise the mmr
you know yeah actually i don't know if you're aware did that years ago there
was in i think a british medical journal the
israeli doctors went on strike and the mortality rates fell yes i know
yes is great we were joking that we should continue
that i mean stop stop all the health
uh um you know program and the health minister and the health office shut it
down and people will be healthy ltl i know exactly oh dear
so here's just a few comments from this is from the um
institute of medicine in in the states which are you know recognized body
who look oversee you know childhood immunization
safety and these are just some of the paragraphs i took from
national vaccine information center it was from a summary
the committee believes that although the available evidence is reassuring
studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative
number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule
have not been conducted no studies have compared the differences
in health outcomes that some stakeholders questioned
between entirely unimmunised populations and fully immunized children
experts who addressed the committee pointed not to a body of evidence that
had been overlooked but rather to the fact that existing research has not been
designed to test the entire immunization schedule
you see they admit it and another paragraph
although each new vaccine is evaluated in the context of the overall
immunization schedule that existed at the time of the review
of that vaccine elements of the schedule are not
evaluated once it is adjusted to accommodate a new vaccine
thus key elements of the entire schedule the number
frequency timing order and age in administration of vaccines have not been
systematically examined in research studies
i mean this isn't very reassuring for the
uh well i hope it's not for the average person
so now we're just looking quick at vaccine efficacy trials
well no double blind random ones placebo controls tiles are done on these
because they generally they will say it's unethical
you you you know conduct a trial of a vaccine
that protects because they're already assuming you see they're assuming the
vaccine offers protection so they're saying we can't leave
one group unprotected but really they should be doing the first study
they need to do is to see if it actually does protect so and as we saw
in the last um presentation that chapman wallace you know he said
at the end of the 1800s no trials controlled trials had ever been done on
the smallpox factory and it's the same now to this day
to this day i mean they're they do have some which where there is one
i think we mentioned it last time tb you know in the end
1968 that's the only one i've come across where they use saline solution
and and then it showed the fact seem to be
less than naught percent effective there are more cases in the vaccinated
so and then this is it's worth them looking up uh you see
they they did study way back in the 80s um a
danish group peter arby and they they they did another study
looking really kind of re-looking at the old
studies back in so in march 2017 they re-looked
at their findings from so they said they
examined the introduction of dp dtp and polio
back in in guinea-bissau in the early 80s 1980s
and without having you can read it afterwards they can freeze the frame but
basically they found that uh the children
who three to five months old who received that dtp
it was associated with the mortality hazard ratio of
five meaning five times more likely to die if they had that that dtp
at the age the actual age of three to five months
compared to the ones that hadn't been vaccinated you know they
they admit these things so they end up conclusion
that the vaccine was associated with increased mortality
and there's a there's a ted talk um one of the uh colleagues of um
rb is um i think her surname is ben b-e-n-n christine christina or
christine ben um and she does a ted talk on this study
and she talks about it she all i'm in fact i was horrified
sometimes as we were saying earlier she sort of talks about how
wow they found out all this stuff you know and there was no sign she
didn't sound remorseful but for these poor babies that all died
those poor um mothers in guinea-bissau who all lost
their babies having that vaccine just just they they found all this
information so just a real quick we just whizzed
through some of these because i expect all your
subscribers have seen these types of graphs before
but you know this is smallpox in england and wales
this is the uh when they brought the first compulsory vaccine in
um but it is so it was carries on going down
of course at that point it wasn't so enforced but when they actually
made it enforced you know that stricter penal clause that came in there look
what happened a three-fold increase in deaths
registered and then it started to fall again and of course
as we know by then more and more people were
um avoiding the vaccine and then of course around this time they brought in
conscientious objective clause so but you know of course
uh why what this this shouldn't have occurred for us
why did that occur and it was happening worldwide and this epidemic
and in remember we saw how thousands and thousands were vaccinated cases
this is whooping cough in the uk so they identified
the bacteria they they feel is is the culprit
but this is where they introduced the first
vaccine for for whooping cough so all this decline in deaths happened before
the uh vaccine was introduced you off you do often see even you know
some increase around wartime which is natural with
when lots of problems with with health and general well-being and everything
this is the red is my i've added in the red
actually but this is the see instead of showing
the graph um we just saw um uh sorry that not that one wrong way
we're going the wrong way now let's go back
right sorry about this just here we are we just saw that one so this is the
graph they should show the doctors but they don't
because this one goes back to 1850 but they show in the health department books
just um oh dear i'm going the wrong way again
here we are it's all right it's it's it's tuesday morning i'm allowed to
so they only show them this they only show from 1950
they don't show the 100 year trend so they introduced a vaccine here and
then you see it's going it's kind of going down
anyway and it had been they had this you know uptake at 79
around there but then they had 31 only around mid 70s because because
they've been scared about brain damage from
the whooping cough vaccine into it fell and then there was this surge of
cases and they blamed it on the people who were saying no to the vaccine
well it turned out that when there was a lot of studies looked into that area
that uh points of time by professor gordon stewart it turned
out that it was very much 50 50 or in the cases whether they were
vaccinated or not as i say here even an 80 and the
outbreak in 82 but one thing that's really interesting
around that same time with these two epidemics
the same thing it was a worldwide epidemic and in sweden for instance they
had very very high uptake of the vaccine and
they also had high number of cases
so instead of blaming um the the parents for not vaccinating because
they couldn't because they had high uptake they actually said the vaccine's
not very effective plus it has side effects so they
actually stopped using it so if you lived in sweden the parents
got told oh this outbreak is due to the vaccine not being effective and it's
dangerous anyway whereas in if you're an english parent
they were told it was because you didn't vaccinate that you had this ambry
it was a worldwide one so it occurred regardless regardless of vaccines
this is tetanus just a quick one for tetanus so
the death rates from tetanus coming down and
although it was used in the military earlier in in the century
um it it it was around this time when they introduced etp so that was then
when it started targeting the you know the every child kind of
thing so you can see the huge decline in deaths
from tetanus um this is one from a book plotkin and
more to mortimer it's a massive book on vaccines
it's like the bible of vaccines and this is when they introduced hep b
vaccine into the united states here and and it says here after more than a
decade however it became apparent that this approach had little
impact on the incidence of hep b in the united states
well it didn't have any impact it went up actually
i don't know what i'd like to be interested to see what's gone on since
but this is a just to show you in germany
this is dr bookworld the german doctor i mentioned earlier
another book he wrote a business based on fear
see a business based on fear that's such a good
title and he just showed that you see this area here the gray area it just
highlights a period of massive vaccination
campaigns by the german health department
and it really shows you that there was no obvious
effect on the decline in trends instead yeah i know and actually it's starting
to as you say it slightly decreases and then becomes
irregular and it's actually starting to kind of
go up again yes but you see here you would have thought if this was intense
it would have gone donk like that you know no and this is just
which vaccine was that that was for the uh
tb yeah i see eb and uh which magazine we have in the uk
i don't know if it still exists but um it's you know which magazine 1977
they showed rather than a graph they showed this
different type of um format the decline in disease so scarlet
fever diphtheria whooping cough measles and as
you can see actually scarlet fever in the 18
later 1800s that accounted for more childhood mortality than the other
three and yet look what happened by 1930
it virtually had disappeared you see so they never introduced the vaccine the
person who gave me this image they'd put these arrows in because
this indicates when they introduce the vaccines for these three diseases
this one they never introduced a vaccine because it it just on its own
on its own it faded out and that's a good
at least we've got this because if they they if we didn't have this we'd never
know we can't compare but these were the four
biggest kind of killers of childhood you know
from childhood um illness and then again um this is bcg here as we
this is where it was introduced and as we said the vaccine
highly highly questionable with very poor eff
efficacy that's putting it politely i mean put on a personal level and i don't
mind saying it i don't actually think vaccines ever
protect anyone for anything and measles this is very dramatic
you see death rate from 1850 is straight down very dramatic and by the
time they introduced 1968 they introduced the first measles single
vaccine the death rate was really really low by
then absolutely and we don't
these are on my website by the way but um
you know even i took all the data from the public health website and put them
into graphs and and we don't have to explain it or not
but the interesting thing is they even say in public health website
that prior to 2006 the last death from acute measles was 1992 so i thought
wow 92 that was when i first kind of i was only a year into my research
i thought well i don't remember any a child dying and
and all it says on the paper is an acute measles death in a one to four year old
but there was no other details and i thought that's strange wonder why
and i'm just quickly show you i looked i thought well
this is what i always say to people a useful tip is to look at what
information is not available on sites such as public health
because you know when the mmr was introduced in 88 it was heavily promoted
so if this death occurred in 1992 in an unvaccinated child it would have given
the department of health a great opportunity
to use this case to frighten parents and encourage uptake
it would have been everywhere headlines oh i'm vaccinating now look
get your mmr but there's absolutely no trace
of any media reports that that year of a measles death
could it be that this child did receive a dose of mmr
and also during 1992 there were two brands of mmr withdrawn from the uk
because they had problems with it did that young child receive one of those
brands see that's why they maybe that's why
they pulled it off i mean yes i mean i did my utmost um
see i was saying many questions but few answers and so i went through
the official national statistics i went through
tables and tables and tables of um it was very exhausting and tiring and
looking at mortality lists throughout 1992
and i finally found that there was a death in a male
from what they called post measles pneumonia
but there's absolutely no detail about his status so you see
this is if it's post mises pneumonia it's even i mean it's just uh an
assumption my own assumption that maybe it was
caused by a vaccine yes because we know it can happen it did
happen and unfortunate for all of us it still
happens i mean well it happens really i mean as far as
i can see it's mostly to do with mismanagement of the nursing
because if you measles needs to express itself with a rash and
everything comes from within and comes out now if
you if you even just suppress fever imagine
if it was a mother oh loads of cow pole
keep the fever down still feeding the child too much all
these things you're pushing everything internal and
that's when it reaches the lungs secondary complications
yes so it could be just poor nursing skills mismanagement over medication
that actually caused the pneumonia but we'll never know and we don't even
know but it to me that absolutely must mean that that child
had vax been vaccinated and then another example of this same type of thing is
what they don't tell you this is very recent in last year 28th of
jan cancer at 22 why the smear test age must
come down and it was an article about a a young
woman from cardiff who was diagnosed with cervical cancer at the age of 22
she had been denied a smear test despite exhibiting
worrying symptoms symptoms so he said the report covered abigail's symptoms
and treatment and how mps were debating a plan to reduce
the age of screening etc etc but this is what fascinated me
on the whole article not once was the hpv vaccine mentioned
why surely it would have been a good opportunity to promote the vaccine and a
chance to say if only she had been vaccinated
unless she was vaccinated because she's at the age where she would have they
started giving them in 2008 onwards um targeting all the teenage
girls so that would i'm sure i would be absolutely sure that she
would because they would have mentioned if she hadn't
and we've had a few cases like that young women developing cervical cancer
in their twenties and and halfway down the text you see
well they have the vaccine but no one talks about it
so and then another in 1959 um this is just to highlight measles and
what bmj british medical journal these these are doctors they're right
these rioters agree that measles is nowadays and
normally a mild infection they said that in 1959
why and i write these kind of letters to i send these kind of
data to public health and they don't i say why would they say that then and yet
now you're saying something very different about me has it
become more virulent is it that more dangerous
since 1959 they never answer and the same thing
here i like this bit here same 1959 in the
majority of children this is measles the whole episode has
been well and truly over in a week from the prodromal phase to the
disappearance of the rash and many mothers this is good
have remarked how much good the attack has done their children
as they seem so much better after the measles
yeah and these are all on my website all on my website
1968 just prior to when this is when they brought the
mmr i'm sorry the single measles vaccine now
so this this text is from this paper and what
well before magda it's even before knowing that measles can actually
immune you or help your immune system against some types of cancer in the
future yes yes yes the mother's hunch your
intuition or feeling or connection with your child
to say something like that it's quite strong and only a mother can say that
you know it's yeah and you know you need to prove it a
mother knows that's it it's it's you can see i mean they say these
childhood acute especially things like measles
after if the if it's allowed to run its course and you don't suppress the fever
you keep them comfortable a bit of fresh air like florence nightingale
and we need another one of her and uh you know
um the child goes up physically and mentally
there's a developmental growth after that
and it's been noted in number i've heard many people say the same and
even a lecturer once he in new zealand he spoke about how his child are
during going through the process of measles the child was
you know sitting there just drawing and trying to you know because you know you
don't feel like doing much and the child's drawings really
it became much more um should i say grown-up adult-like
just after a change he even showed the pictures how
they had matured that bit more after that
it's amazing so this one also says you know this is a dot to say money
we know is short for the health service yet a program of general immunization
costing 1 million pounds is to be started in the spring
in 1968 i have not seen a complication of measles for at
least the last four epidemics and i do not prescribe routine antibiotics
a child who contracts measles is ill for a few days and is protected for life
an injection of live vaccine may protect during childhood with
a possible reaction for a day or two leaving the possibility of measles
infection in adolescence or later a risk to be run
and an unpleasant one what does individual gain can we afford this in
indefinite advantage at present you see this
this woman was very clued up yes that's exactly what's happening now we are
getting them in adolescence or later yeah yeah so um
so and also does absence of disease i mean if you don't get these things is
it a sign of health not necessarily if children are
compromised by all the vaccines they receive in their early years
will this make them less likely to actually have the ability
to develop an acute childhood disease to eliminate all that buildup of toxins
because if you've got a suppressed system you can't
even throw a fever so you know it's not a sign of health if
you don't have these things and another thing they probably hear
they um where you are they they say they often
say it's your duty to have your children and you
and yourself vaccinated in order to protect those who are unable
to be vaccinated because they have very compromised immune systems or
have their undergoing immunosuppressive treatments they often use that as an
emotional blackmail yeah i'd firstly say well this
highlights how toxic and immune compromising vaccines are if
vaccines are not tolerated in these individuals then why should they'll see
children receive vaccines and risks becoming compromised
or even worse um resulting in death even for the assumed i would say assumed
protection it may offer someone else's child
and this is all on my website you can find them in the frequently um
asked questions and also secondly why is the following statement made on some
patient guidelines cancer patients should avoid contact
with recently vaccinated individuals and that's because they are concerns
regarding vaccine shedding especially live vaccines and as
we said before polio vaccine and all that
so um yeah so we we could say who who actually poses the greater threat
the unvaccinated or the vaccinated to these
compromised immune um or immunosuppressive
people on immunosuppressive drugs and everything so
there's um and why should and another big question we should
ask is why is there such an increase worldwide of children developing
autoimmune disease and cancer such young ages and whether the routine
baby vaccines are playing a role you know these all obvious things there
is on my website if you go on the frequently asked question there's a
this is quite an art a good article if you if regarding the cancer
um comments so she's a mother of a a of a child with cancer and she she
writes a very interesting article don't vaccinate to protect my
cancer ch nice cancer based on that based on just
what you read oh yeah very good so you know they can get
so here it's probably the same everywhere um this is our 1984
immunization schedule you know and now and that was only 2017 when i did this
one it's worth you know they keep adding more and more
bigger you know again the the official ones you know it's getting more and more
complicated there's so many target groups we've got
target groups now you know and there's all who who else
can we target it's almost like let's think about
an enemy yeah yeah elderly people target us no we're
targeting you diabetics we're targeting you
if you've got anything you know if you smile they'll be targeting i think
i know so this is the la i'm coming to the store i'm getting near the end i
hope you're still on the edge of your seat
um so in 2016 the world health organization produced
this document you can download it they keep
updating it and changing the the graphics of it how to respond to
vocal vaccine deniers in public so it's for health professionals and it
teaches them how to how to deal with people such as
perhaps i'm sure well i'm probably on one of the
top lists but anyway so vaccine hesitancy this is used a lot
for a sort of term as we know now for parents who
and i'm saying well it's it's they're talking about it like it's a new medical
condition so in 2017 they published a
paper misinformation lingers in memory failure of three pro vaccination
strategies and it opens a paper and as with most
papers they open with the same paragraph almost vaccines are the safest
and most effective tools for preventing
infectious diseases and their success in achieving relevant public health
outcomes such as the reduction or eradication of
many life-threatening conditions is well established well it may be well
established but doesn't mean it's true they establish all sorts of things
however many people appear hesitant about
vaccines doubting their benefits and worrying over their safety or
questioning the need for them this is in the paper and in the abstract
of the paper it says people's inability to update their memories
in light of corrective information may have important public health
consequences as in the case of vaccination choice in
the present study we compare three potentially effective strategies in
vaccine promotion so we're gonna contrast in myths versus
facts employing fact and icon boxes and
showing images of non-vaccinated sick children yes they use all these awful
pictures in fact sometimes it turns out that the
child has been vaccinated but anyway and the abstract continued results
show that existing strategies to correct vaccine misinformation
are ineffective and often backfire resulting in the unintended opposite
effect reinforcing ill-founded beliefs about
vaccine vaccination and reducing intentions to
vaccinate so then now they're worrying that their methods are making us
question it even more now this is my this is just me
i mean i said it on a radio program i was actually on a radio program with the
researcher of that paper although we never actually
were allowed to speak with he he dis he said his bit and
disappeared off the radio and then i i so i wasn't able to challenge him
directly so anyway i said rather than study in
the mental state of those who are vaccine hesitant
and creating strategies to push any concerns out of their mind and increase
uptake shouldn't they be looking at why people
are becoming vaccine hesitant you know
no i was going to say they're always looking at you know not
you know all we must like to say that oh we must find ways of making you
accept it they don't ask let's have a look at why let's really have a look
at what you're worried about right so also the who
basically announced or declared that vaccines
hesitancy is one of the major threats to world health and i'm thinking
hang on what about cancer what about heart problems what about this is just
on the health side what about radiation fluoridation i mean
agenda and for those who don't see the agenda
i i just have to i i'm just saying wake up guys you know come on
come on wake up look for yourself stop swallowing all this propaganda
can't you see even the words they are choosing
it's it's that obvious that they're trying to push something down our throat
and when someone trying to force you to do something it means a he
didn't manage to convince you logically rationally that this is the
right thing to do and b you have to suspect
when someone tried to force you to do something as as a living normal human
being thinking human being you have to suspect
otherwise you are a sheep sorry yes oh no
absolutely absolutely so um i always say you know
we might if i'd give a talk do not mention the v
word because if you do they say are you medically qualified
otherwise you have no right to discuss this subject
or if you are medically qualified and have concerns you may be advised that
your career prospects will suffer if you continue with this line of research
because you'll be then your medical heritage so
labeling is a technique that the medical establishment are using more and more on
anyone who dares question the v word so because of this paper i went away and
i've i've created a few um conditions that the medical um
authorities are suffering with vaccine study reluctance syndrome
vaccine ineffectiveness deniers vaccine injuries and deaths
disassociation complex
obsessive coincidence disorder yeah i know the last one now can fit to many
other fields you know yeah exactly but you know it's funny i i
actually wrote a rapid response for british medical journal
um addressing you know about compulsory vaccines and all that and i actually
added that bit in and they published it in british medical
excellence so you know and i i say i say it it's true actually they are
true things they're suffering with but you
know i'm not anti-doctor as i said in the previous one i feel sorry for them
sure so i and so there's no proper debate so that
it's a no-go area for any critical discussion examination
independent analysis doctors and scientists who dare to indicate any
concerns are met with hostility ridicule censorship and
sometimes dismissal from their profession so that doesn't encourage
others to voice any concerns because they fear the repercussions so
they just stay silent until maybe when they're on their
deathbed and then they start admitting things
you know at this point i just i just want to say something that
um a friend a neighbor you know from around where i live
she said that can you go one slide back please
yeah all right she she told me and my wife that
um you know she doesn't raise a voice regarding vaccines just
she didn't vaccine her children but if someone comes to her house and you know
she has books and she can if someone just asks
then she's answers you know like she wouldn't uh initiate a conversation
about it she wouldn't say uh that's right my opinion unless
she's asked and if someone's just showing some interest in the field
only if they visit her house obviously yeah and i told her
that's really good but i really think we are beyond
that because time is is of the essence and it is time for
everyone who knows something especially if he's a mom or a dad you
know but mostly moms and it's time to speak up because you
know there's the the famous saying that first they came to take the communists
but i was in the communist and they came and take the
i don't know the jews but i wasn't the jew etc etc
and there was no one left to speak for me and unfortunate for all of us
we need all of us to speak for our children
because they cannot speak and soon it will be false vaccinations on
adults see what happens with the corona and nowadays
so it's time to speak up it's time to stand up stand our own
ground and sell our opinion we are entitled for an
opinion even if we are not doctors we are parents
we are alive we're human beings we're men and women
and we are created here by the image of god and we were given
freedom and we were not given the choice to give up this freedom
we were given freedom by god and we need to keep it that way
and we are not entitled to give this freedom away i'll say it
again we are not we don't have the right to give up our freedom
i mean i keep saying everyone please be more courageous because the more
courageous you are i mean pers on a personal level i throw
myself in the lion's den almost daily now sure i don't have any
and actually i feel a sense of liberation with it the because i i'm
only i'm not it's nothing negative i'm just
trying to get people to think be strong and be and
it's no good having an opinion you know some if they could have an
opinion if it's not based on any knowledge
you know some people are very opinionated but when i ask them
oh well which papers really you convinced you
well they haven't got any they look blank because they said well the doctor
said well that's not that's not a good um
basis for your opinion read some books look into it find out
you know and on the other side it's not worth
having an opinion if you if you don't speak it up
you know i know yes again i know you have to i mean i do i i
i do it more and more now even when i'm out you know i
i sometimes if i'm chatting to someone and then they've got a little baby and
they're very we're just having a chat i don't really know them but we're sitting
next to each other in a cafe or something and they
we've sort of started talking and then i i did recently i i said look
i i i don't normally do this but i said i've got
you know seeing your baby there and it's be due for vaccines i said
here's a little card about maybe please look into it
you know and just go and read some proper stuff not newspaper you know it's
yeah exactly newspapers oh gosh no they're really bad like a friend said
everything you see on the news is advertisement
everything is it's a tv everything i mean the news it's an
advertisement there's no advertisement break
while the news going on while a reality talk show well
no everything is advertisement you switch on the tv you switch on
advertisement you start yeah we open a newspaper it's
all advertisement it doesn't matter if it's
for a a toothpaste or for a pharmaceutical
company or for a political group it doesn't
matter it's all advertisement and we need to we need to
understand that we need to realize that because nowadays it's
it's our life that on the line yes and the future you know
yeah so this is just a sweet i love there's a little bit here in the middle
but it's from this book from the 1930s and because it's it's
like why is this still going on and it this also likens it to a charmed circle
he said well the public at large find it hard to believe that the medical
establishment would universally defend vaccination so
the average person concludes that the weight of scientific
opinion must be correct respected over the view of a few antis
no matter how intelligent and honest they be so they all must be okay
but this bit i love the public and most doctors
rather than form an independent judgment they accept the truth of authority
rather than the authority of truth such a good
sentence that is you know that's exactly what we do
so as i say many doctors advocate vaccination largely because the public
are also so willing to accept it oh yeah okay thanks i have it
and most doctors haven't studied the subject in
any great depth and so the profession and the
pro-vaccine public are following one another
around in a sort of charmed circle it's a bit
you know as a good description of it it's like the chicken and the egg you
don't know yeah sort of thing i mean we're getting
right near you know sort of nearer than up to date
but so there are at least some good doctor speaking out um they
are you know put in their um medical career
and on on the line really but um and some
organizations i mean some of them come and go but there are
if you know plenty of a build-up of more and more um
medical people speaking out i mean in australia
just this was probably about two years ago now for example doctors nurses and
midwives who have found to show any sympathy
towards parents who question vaccination are being targeted more and more
and they risk deregistration and downward turn in any career
prospects and actually there was a chat there
greg hunt his name was hunt actually it was quite appropriate
he was hunting out he said health professionals are also being encouraged
to report to the officials if they are aware of
any sympathizers amongst their colleagues
you know if any doc if you know another nurse who
is questioning vaccines or a doctor who's sympathetic you have to report
them one of your own sounds like communist
australia yes absolutely draconian so there's
there's some doctors like this chap polevsky
one of his quotes you know as as we see the number of vaccines added to the
schedule we are also seeing a tremendous increase in the number of chronic
diseases in children um archicad he was based in australia i
actually met him in in 1995. i went over to new zealand and
he's passed away since but uh he said up to 90 percent of the total decline in
death rate of child children between 1816 to 1965 because of
whooping cough scarlet fever dips syrian measles occurred
before the introduction of the immunizations well
we saw that in the grass you've got people like dr
suzanne humphries although many people did die from whooping cough in the early
part by the time same thing decline blah blah blah
there's many good youtube um lectures that she's
she's been involved with um now this is the german doctor that i
showed a few things i actually met him as well
um he only got involved in it because his
son um as a baby was given smallpox vaccine in the late 1950s and became
severely brain damaged he realized it was the vaccine and from
then on he spent the rest of his life trying to um gain um he used well
to get more people to look at medical people to look into it he also
supported parents with vaccine damage children and he lectured as
much as he possibly could a very kindly dear person that um
never saw justice even for his own child really but um and very severely damaged
and he said we should be aware and very much concerned
about the terrible damage sometimes obvious
often insidious i think that's a lot of that
caused to our children by vaccination which is covered up
trivialized or as now in the case of whooping cough vaccinations denied
altogether so he he wrote some books another lady
who was the editor of um uh new england journal of medicine
this isn't just about vaccines it's just generally about medical literature
and she said we the the public um she sorry she went public saying we
can no longer trust the medical authorities in medical literature
the pressure from the money involved in what gets published and what doesn't get
published has just skewed the medical publishing industry
to the point where medical literature is no longer reliable
and there's many others that have said very similar things
this is professor gordon stewart the chap from i mentioned in the
mid 70s with the whooping cough
so by the time he retired in 1984 he was a fellow of both the royal
colleges of physicians pathology faculties of public health et cetera et
cetera so he was very well um uh respected chap
and this is said here um latterly his interest in immunization led to him
becoming a controversial commentator on the dangerous
whooping cough vaccine a subject he was passionate about but which made him
unconventional you see they use these words soon as someone questioned
something among the medical community yet greatly
respected by the parents of damaged children
this is what he said in one piece in a matter of such importance where concern
on all sides is genuine and pressing i do not wish to end this article
inconclusively my own view based upon some years of
observation and experience is quite firm i supported
the use of the vaccine in 1951 and subsequently with very little
hesitation until about 1972 and gave put pertussis vaccine between
51 and 56 to each of my four children this is the best bit i would not dream
of doing so again because it has become clear to me not
only that vaccine is incompletely protective
but also that the side effects which i thought to be temporary
are in fact dangerous unpredictably so and he said and i actually met him
actually in on a program one time right in there
probably probably a year or so before he passed
away but he he got to 97 so he did very well
this is the bit this there is no doubt in my mind that in the uk alone
some hundreds if not thousands of well infants have suffered irreparable brain
damage needlessly and that their lives and
those of their parents have been wrecked in consequence you can see why it wasn't
popular with just a few more and then we we're
really near the end now so another great chap so graham wilson
he worked for public health laboratory um in 1940 well um
41-63 was a director and he wrote a book after he retired the hazards of
immunization and these are just a few quotes from him
in any truly democratic country opposition
and the freedom to express opinions contrary to those
of the majority are the breath of life and it is thoroughly wholesome for long
adopted practices to be submitted from time to time
to critical scrutiny less the accumulated weight of precedent
is allowed to obscure the need for their discontinuance
very interesting and i love um yeah all these
great quotes from these people my purpose in these lectures is not to
battle or to join sides with the anti
vaccination vaccinationists or to take up any partisan attitude but
to try soberly and honestly to present such
information as we have on the hazards attending vaccination against smallpox
and immunization against other diseases so you just want that but this is this
is my favorite favorite one finally i cannot express too
strongly my gratitude to dr o'brien who long after his retirement from the
directorship of the welcome physiological research laboratories at
beckenham handed over to me a valuable set of
documents with which he felt and i've put it in
red unable to cope and without which it is doubtful whether
the present book would ever have been written
so he so this dr o'brien who'd been in retirement for a
very long time and apparently i think he went to live in australia
he still had a vast quantity of documents
that he was unable to cope with i mean he could have had a bonfire
but he kept them and then he passed them on to
to sir graham wilson and with obviously had a lot of data
in there with about vaccine problems vaccine um
side effects but he was unable to cope with that document
and he but he felt the need to pass it on to someone so that the
the data wouldn't be lost so again when they get
later in their life maybe they feel they need to
make amends for for things that have been hidden
over the years when they were working in those areas
and so graham concludes over overconfidence must at all costs be
avoided it is for us and for those who come
after us to see that the sword which vaccines and anti-seria have put
into our hands is never allowed to tarnish through
overconfidence negligence carelessness or want of
foresight on our part so nice people these characters they
they did they didn't have to put all that in and
uh and as we're coming to the end now you know we know like mandatory vaccines
everywhere appear in belgium um croatia check we
don't most of these you can there's a website
which i've got here on efvv website you can check out the
situation they they try to keep it updated but
gradually they're bringing more and more france especially in jan 2018 macron
introduced 11 mandatory vaccines before that they
only had two or three you know when really shot
up it italy of course as well and all that so
at the moment there's there aren't specifically
many or maybe there's one or two now but germany at the moment
they're pushing for this one this month march 2020
i think there's going to be a big demonstration in munich um
some is it the 21st of march or somewhere around there
um and this is the website if anyone wants to check out
the general v what's going on um in europe about
mandatory um heidi larsen she's the part of the vaccine confidence project
and this was back in 2018 she was saying about the
change in trends regarding increased as you say
vaccine hesitancy and refusal and etc now we don't have to read all that
now she but she was also another lady who
was at this conference in december um vaccine
um safety summit the world health organization
and this is what she also she made of many interesting points actually and i'm
only just put a few here we have a very
wobbly health professional front line she said
she described how people will lose trust if they cannot get proper
answers from their health professionals but she then went on to admit
in medical school you're lucky if you have a half a day on vaccines
never mind keeping up to date with all of it
and she also stated to the delegates that we
are in a very fragile state now we've developed a world that is dependent on
vaccine-induced immunity
and she it's funny how they were thing she she actually said
she was very happy to see that a new term had been established
isr which stands for immunization stress related responses
she said these are serious symptoms some of these vaccine
she was referring to vaccine side effects type of thing she said they're
serious symptoms pain eating disorder a whole range of
symptoms are very real and that they may not have
been caused by the contents of the vaccines
but they could probably be attributable more to the
vaccine experience so she was saying it wasn't the vaccine itself it's the
experience of having the vaccine that has caused these symptoms then i
know unbelievable she talked about the hpv
reactions she said that due to the internet
these girls were mimicking other girls come on
they were anxiety related oops sorry and lost it again justin
here we are they were anxiety related in other words she's just referring to them
as psychosomatic these all these vaccines psychosomatic
and that the clusters of anxiety-related reactions
after immunization this is the bit i said earlier had
adversely affected the immunization program
that came across as the main concern it's like oh no
the stress for the medical world when people start asking questions
you know this is what's happening so and we just had this in well 2017 this
particular they had a paper in a british medical journal uk
doctors re-examine case for mandatory vaccines it was about
a motion that had been put through a british medical association annual
conference and this particular doctor farah jamil
um she said parents who willingly choose not to vaccinate their children
despite the safe evidence base are displaying negligent behaviors that are
in some cases seriously harming the health of children who have no say or
control over this decision and in extreme situations costing lives
but fortunately there are other doctors voicing concerns
you know that these hardline approaches um are not a good idea
i did try to make contact with dr jamil i was actually going to ask her if she
could develop on on this um comment and maybe she could
present to them some parents some negligent these ones who
display negligent behaviors in her eyes um but i was not even allowed to be
put in touch with her i put the you know nice email i said could you
forward it and they said due to um data protection um they couldn't pass
it on to her so never had any communication
at least in 2019 there was one letter an extract in the guardian where
we don't have to read this all but a professor
of the british society for immunology he basically was saying basically
that it's not there's no current evidence that it would
compulsory vaccination would increase the uk
immunization rate but rather that it might increase
alienation parents etc so and my la um in in one rapid response
in 2017 on this mandatory um issue i just ended with it is time for
independent examination without recrimination and not a time for
coercive measures which inflict upon our freedom of choice
and uh that's that's my um end of my
presentation so and let me do we stop sharing now
stop sharing okay we're back to normal so yeah i yeah it was a bit of a long
one but um not too bad it was probably similar to the other one maybe but uh
yeah at least you sort of touch on them you know touch on a lot of aspects of it
and um hopefully get people looking in books
and thinking and because it's just it's appalling isn't
it you know when you think how they push push push
and when you look at all the background story it's full of holes
full of uncertainties full of not really understanding things and
don't you know it's and we don't have healthy people i
mean if we had a whole planet of very healthy
people now fair enough we're going the opposite direction unfortunately and
yeah i mean we need some serious critical thinking
for all of us all of us need to kind of upgrade
our i don't know upgrade our intelligence
well i think actually do you find it i think the more it's easy not to think
and i suppose everyone they go to work they do their job they they just have to
do whatever they have to do daily come home they just watch tv they don't
have to think much and i think the more you think
actually your brain cells start kind of evolving
you know absolutely what do they say if you don't use it you lose it yeah
so it's the same you know yeah sorry kind of 12 years ago when i woken
up to the hidden nature of reality
since then i'm just that's my internal feeling
i'm just developing my brain and my skills
and evolving really evolving not declining but
really growing you know and this i think this is what we're here to do i mean
not to deal with bad science and conspiracies and
you know not that but we need to learn about these things in order to overcome
them in order to learn what's holding us back you know you know for us
to evolve properly and the the the work that you are doing
magda i think is brilliant and i think a lot of people especially parents
they need to listen to all your whether it's the the magazines the
lectures the presentations that you do because it's
even if you don't speak english even if you don't understand english you
must find someone to translate these things for you because it's so crucial
so important and even try to find someone in your own country to
who is doing similar work so you can be exposed to it and even share it after
you learned it yourself and you don't need to be
an expert on these things as we said also in the
in the first uh talk we had especially if you're a parent
you don't need to be a professional you just need to protect your child that's
it and you have god's right to do it that's it
that's it no one can say otherwise i mean they can say what they want
but your children are yours and you have the right and the obligation to protect
them do it oh and actually it's the simple things
in life you don't need all this complicated stuff to be healthy
that's the beauty of it it's very simple you just you know as we say if you've
got reasonable living conditions and reasonable diet and and and joy
around you rather than all this negative
fear-mongering all this this pandemic or that pandemic
i was thinking it as i was lying in bed last night you know just a few simple
words can put so much fear into the whole
population of the world and yeah if they announce imagine today
if they suddenly said the pandemic is over all you know
everything's fine everyone was like ah and yet it's all
it's all just words they just put up there and they
terrify people and i can't believe well actually we always say why do you
believe it please don't believe it look into it
because it's really a way of manipulating and
and bringing in other um control mechanisms and um
martial law and and regulations we don't you know that's
really don't feed their feed into their um
their statements just those few words don't fall into the traps though
they're putting absolutely no so but uh yeah so well anyway
thank you very much darling you your great gift to this world thank you so
much and we'll catch up very soon and
hopefully to see you in the oh third better start writing one we can
always have a chat now and again you know it's true i think next time we
should do that because it's good also just the chat it doesn't
have to be long and you know you can only you can even just show
i don't know a few slides just to make a point you know
not just like a presentation but during the chat you can just
uh you know just share some slides i think it's really
keeps it alive and uh it's also it's great
but anyway i really love the presentation thank you very much
very interesting um yes it's good because what what yeah because
i i was only gonna say it's good i'm glad they're out there because if i you
know less it's harder and harder to book a venue now and have a talk and
i don't like i like to be more natural and chat about
things it is a bit formal or this but at least people can
freeze frame it they can read it slowly they can look at you know
they can always contact me if they want to find out if they can't
find the reference anyone can welcome you know but you know
let's have a chat next time a nice you know relaxed chat even though we're
talking about a very serious subject but yeah anyway thank you
thank you very much thank you so much and we'll catch up very soon
okay great thanks a lot all the best bye thank you bye